More than sales, we engineer

Most companies arriving on this page do not need a humanoid, and the fastest way to be useful is to say which ones do.

If the task happens in one place, on parts that arrive in the same orientation every time, a fixed industrial arm will do it faster, more repeatably and for less money. If the task is moving boxes along a fixed route on a flat floor, a mobile robot or a conveyor is the answer. If the task is inspection along a route with stairs, gravel or grating, a quadruped is the answer, and it is a considerably smaller purchase.

What a humanoid is for is work in a space built for people, too varied to fixture and too low in volume to justify rebuilding the space. Machine tending across several machines at different heights. Picking mixed items from shelving sized for a human reach. A task that changes every few weeks, where reprogramming has to cost less than retooling. Somewhere a person does five different things in a shift and only two of them are worth automating.

The other legitimate reason is timing. Some companies buy now to have hands on the technology and people trained before it becomes ordinary. That is a defensible decision as long as it is the stated one. It goes wrong when it is presented internally as a productivity project and then measured as one.

If you recognise your process in the second paragraph rather than the third, say so on the contact form and we will tell you what we think you should be looking at instead. It costs us a conversation and saves you a year.